|
|||||||||
|
Cutting-edge science: the church and the study of human anatomy By Carol Glatz Catholic News Service VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Many readers of the Vatican’s official
newspaper might have been taken by surprise in mid-January by an article
effusively praising a well-known exhibition of “plastinated” human
bodies, which was making an extended stop in Rome. Body Worlds, which L’Osservatore Romano called a “wonderful
ode to respect for the body,” is an exhibition of preserved human
corpses, displayed in often sporty stances. The show thus bears many similarities to another show, Bodies: The
Exhibition, which drew strong criticism a few years back from
Catholic bishops in the United States, Canada and England, who expressed
concerns over whether the preserved bodies were being exploited or degraded
by being on public display. The different reaction to the show in Rome may stem, at least in part,
from promoters’ claims that all of the cadavers in Body Worlds
are on display with the prior consent of the deceased. By contrast, news
reports from 2008 revealed that the Bodies exhibition included
unclaimed and unidentified cadavers from China — strongly suggesting
there was little if any free consent involved. The Catholic Church has consistently taught that the human body must be
treated with respect, in accordance with the preservation of human dignity.
Many critics, meanwhile, have said such concerns only put the brakes on
science. In fact, the church and the Vatican have a long history of promoting
knowledge of the human body. One 18th-century pope even sponsored a show
that might be considered the Body Worlds of its day. Pope Benedict XIV established the first Anatomical Museum in Italy in his
hometown of Bologna after he commissioned in 1742, eight life-size wax
figures, designed on the basis on human autopsies. He wanted the museum to educate the public, inspire future anatomists and
aid artists with more accurate representations of the human form, said
Rebecca Messbarger, an expert in Enlightenment Italy who teaches at Washington
University in St. Louis. Before his 1740 election as pope, then-Cardinal Prospero Lambertini
socialized with academics, doctors and anatomists, promoted women scholars,
acquired and donated scientific instruments, and worked to see Bologna’s
Institute of Science become the nerve centre of cutting-edge medical
science and study. He also established a school of obstetrics and supplied
it with terra-cotta and wax models to help train surgeons and midwives. Medical education was undergoing a huge revolution in the 18th century,
as anatomists shed abstract theories about how the body worked, in favour
of hands-on study with actual cadavers. According to Andrea Carlino, professor of the history of medicine at the
University of Geneva, Pope Benedict threw his full support behind this
new methodology. Carlino noted that the church had never formally prohibited
the dissection of the deceased for anatomical study. At the time, however, the culturally and legally acceptable sources of
corpses for scientific study were limited to the unclaimed bodies of the
poor, executed criminals and heretics. It was the shortage of cadavers
that led to rampant grave robbing. So Cardinal Lambertini, then archbishop of Bologna, urged his priests
to convince parishioners to donate their own and their loved ones’ bodies
to science, arguing that anatomical study promoted public health. Pope Benedict’s interest in and experience with anatomy was the foundation
of his four-volume book on canonization and miracles, Messbarger said,
in which he referred “as much to the masters of anatomy as to the
fathers of the church.” As Messbarger puts it, the pope knew that “in order to understand
the supernatural, you have to understand the natural.” In other
words, to determine whether a healing is miraculous or not, it is vital
to understand the nature of the disease or illness, what could or could
not be cured, and the role the mind might play in the physical manifestation
of disease. Like his 21st-century successor with the same name, the Enlightenment Pope
Benedict saw no conflict between faith and reason. “One of the reasons he’s such a promoter of science is because he really saw the danger of superstition and he wanted people’s faith to be based on Scripture,” Messbarger said. “He wanted a more reasonable expression of faith.” |
|
|||||||