|
|||||||||
|
RNS
Digest c.
2010 Religion News Service Vatican
orders bishops to report charges to police By
Francis X. Rocca VATICAN CITY
(RNS) — The Vatican on April 12 published an online guide to its
disciplinary procedures in processing cases of sexually abusive priests,
including a mandate to co-operate with local civil authorities. Running less
than 700 words in length, the guide is intended for lay people and non-specialists
in church law. Based on a 2001 decree by Pope John Paul II, it explains
in ordinary language the rules followed by church officials, both at the
local level and at the Vatican, in investigating and punishing cases of
sex abuse. According to
the guide, the “local diocese investigates every allegation of sexual
abuse of a minor by a cleric,” and refers every allegation with
a “semblance of truth” to the Vatican’s doctrinal office,
which since 2001 has had global jurisdiction over cases of pedophile priests. “Civil
law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should
always be followed,” the guide notes. Some critics
have pointed to a 2001 letter by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope
Benedict XVI, imposing a “pontifical secret” on all sex abuse
investigations as evidence he conspired to cover up for pedophile priests.
The Vatican has insisted that bishops were never forbidden to report such
crimes to the local civil authorities. The online
guide emphasizes the local bishop’s “power to protect children
by restricting the activities of any priest in his diocese,” even
before investigations have concluded. Recent weeks
have brought charges that Ratzinger, who ran the Vatican’s doctrinal
office from 1981 until his election as pope in 2005, delayed acting against
pedophile priests despite entreaties from local bishops who sought to
discipline them. The “most
serious” penalty that can be imposed on a clerical sex abuser is
defrocking (“dismissal from the clerical state”), either as
a result of a trial or in rare cases by decree of the pope, the guide
notes. When accused
priests themselves asked to be defrocked, the document notes, the pope
can choose to grant their requests “for the good of the church.” The guide notes
that changes to the law governing the Vatican’s handling of sex
abuse allegations are currently “under discussion,” but any
such modifications “will not change” the rules outlined in
the document.
VATICAN CITY
(RNS) — Pope Benedict XVI is ready to hold more meetings with victims
of clerical sex abuse, his top spokesperson stated on April 9. “The
pope has written that he is available for new meetings with (victims),
taking the same path as the whole community of the church,” wrote
Rev. Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See Press Office, on the
website of Vatican Radio. Lombardy also
called for continued application of internal church discipline against
clerical sex abusers and “collaboration with the civil authorities
... taking into account the specific laws and situations of different
countries.” Last month,
in an open letter to Irish Catholics regarding the church’s sex
abuse crisis, Benedict recalled that “on several occasions since
my election to the See of Peter, I have met with victims of sexual abuse,
as indeed I am ready to do in the future.” “I have
sat with them, I have listened to their stories, I have acknowledged their
suffering, and I have prayed with them and for them,” Benedict wrote. Earlier this
week, two of the five victims who met with the pope during his April 2008
visit to the US announced plans for a demonstration in Rome this October
to call for more action to prevent sex abuse and help victims. “It’s
been two years now, and little has been done,” Bernie McDaid, one
of the victims, told the National Catholic Reporter. On Friday,
an advocate for abuse victims dismissed the pope’s willingness to
hold further meetings as insignificant. “Kids
need and deserve immediate protection and dramatic reform, not public
relations ploys and photo ops,” said Barbara Dorris of the Survivors
Network of those Abused by Priests. “They need substance, not symbols.” Poll:
Pope’s approval ratings plummet over abuse scandal By
Kimberlee Hauss (RNS) —
As sex abuse scandals continue to roil the Roman Catholic Church, Pope
Benedict XVI’s approval ratings have plummeted, according to a new
study, with 44 per cent of Americans saying he has done a “poor”
job handling the issue. Just 12 per
cent of Americans say the pope has done an “excellent” (3
per cent) or “fair” (9 per cent) job with the scandal, a significant
drop from April 2008, when the pope visited the United States. At that
time, 39 per cent said he had done an excellent or good job addressing
clergy sex abuse. The poll, conducted
by the nonpartisan Pew Research centre for the People & the Press
and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, was released on Wednesday
(April 7)and based on a national telephone survey April 1-5. Recent news
media reports have raised questions about whether Benedict mishandled
predatory priests while he was an archbishop in Germany and head of the
Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Positive opinions
of Benedict have fallen across the board, including the opinions of Catholics.
Weekly Mass attendees remain the pope’s biggest supporters, but
only 44 per cent say he has done a good job handling the scandal, down
from 60 per cent in 2008. Both mainline
and evangelical Protestants are more critical of the pope than Catholics,
with 72 per cent giving him fair or poor ratings. Religiously unaffiliated
Americans prove to be the most critical: 86 per cent say the pope has
handled the sex abuse scandal fairly or poorly. The maximum
margin of sampling error for the survey is plus or minus four percentage
points. Cardinal
under scrutiny for reassigning abusive priest An attorney
who represented priest sex-abuse victims in Oregon on April 2 released
a 2006 deposition by Cardinal William J. Levada, who was archbishop of
Portland from 1986-1995. Levada is now
prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican
office that since 2001 has claimed jurisdiction over all abuse cases. Much of the
information, including Levada’s decision to reassign a priest known
to have sexually abused teenage boys, has been reported in the past, through
lawsuits and the archdiocese’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. But Portland
attorney Erin Olson released the 293-page deposition after reading statements
by Levada, who attacked The New York Times in defending the pope’s
role in handling priests who sexually abused children. Levada had
criticized The Times for faulting Pope Benedict XVI — then Cardinal
John Ratzinger — for the failure to defrock a Wisconsin priest who
had sexually abused as many as 200 deaf children. Levada’s
defence “did not particularly surprise me,” Olson said, “considering
he had made the decision to reinstate a priest who was a child abuser
to a parish that had a school.” Olson was referring
to Rev. Joseph Baccellieri, who at first was removed from his position
in 1992 when Levada learned of allegations of sex abuse of teenage boys
from the 1970s. Levada reassigned him to another parish in 1995. In the 2006
deposition, Levada defended the decision, saying the priest went through
extensive therapy, and the pastor of the parish was charged with overseeing
Baccellieri, as therapists recommended. In addition, he said in the deposition,
“I have seen nothing to date that leads me to think my actions in
this matter were not responsible and appropriate.” He also defended
not informing parishioners of the priest’s history. “It might
give people the implication that if they are being told this, that I am
suspecting that he ... may be a risk to their children,” Levada
said, according to the Associated Press, adding later that “I stand
on that — on that judgment I made.” No new claims
surfaced against Baccellieri since those from the 1970s. The deposition
is one of several documents that were placed under seal until a July 2009
ruling by the US bankruptcy judge overseeing the archdiocese’s Chapter
11 filing. Copyright 2010 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission. |
|
|||||||