|
|||||||||
|
RNS
Digest Pope
urges ‘sensitivity’ as mass changes are introduced
The pope said the changes, if handled correctly, will help prevent “ any risk of confusion or bewilderment” in the most sweeping changes to Catholic worship since the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s. Benedict did not specify a release date, saying only that the text “will soon be ready for publication.” Australia’s Cardinal George Pell, chair of the advisory committee, told the National Catholic Register the translation will not be available for use in churches before 2011 at the earliest. Catholic churches around the world replaced Latin for local vernacular languages in the wake of modernizing reforms of the 1960s. The Vatican ordered changes in 2001 of the translation used in English-speaking countries to make it conform more closely to the Latin original. The process has been fraught with controversy. Some clergy and lay people have objected to phrasing and vocabulary they find awkward or clunky. Others have argued a more faithful translation produces language of greater solemnity. In the current version of
the mass in English, for instance, a priest prays over the bread and
wine for communion by saying: “Let your Spirit come upon these
gifts, to make them holy.” In the revised version, he
will instead say: “Make holy, therefore, these gifts, we pray,
by sending down your Spirit upon them like the dewfall.” In a statement on Saturday
(May 1), the Vatican announced the conclusion of an investigation into
the Legion, also known as the Legionaries of Christ, which began last
July. The investigation was prompted
by revelations that the movement’s founder, the late Rev. Marcial
Maciel, had fathered at least one illegitimate child and sexually abused
minors. “The serious and objectively
immoral behaviour of Father Maciel, supported by incontrovertible evidence,
at times constitutes real crimes, and manifests a life devoid of scruples
and of genuine religious feeling,” the Vatican’s statement
said. Noting that Maciel’s
legacy calls for a “journey of profound re-evaluation,”
the Vatican said the pope would “soon” name a delegate and
a commission to study the movement’s constitution, with an eye
to redefining its mission and power structure. Benedict will appoint another
official, called a visitor, to oversee reforms at the Legion’s
affiliated lay movement, Regnum Christi, the Vatican said. The Vatican promised that
the reform process would entail “sincere confrontation with all
those who, inside and outside the Legion, were victims of sexual abuse
and of the power system devised by the founder.” Controversy around Maciel
dates at least as far back as 1997, when nine former Legionaries accused
him of sexual abuse decades earlier, while they were studying to become
priests under his authority. Maciel, who died in 2008,
was not disciplined during the reign of Pope John Paul II, when the
Legion rose to its greatest prominence. But in 2006, under Benedict,
the Vatican announced that Maciel had been ordered to lead a “life
reserved to prayer and penitence, renouncing all public ministry.” The Legion continued to honour
Maciel in its official literature and to deny the allegations against
him until last year. Earlier this year, two Mexican
men also stepped forward to claim Maciel was their father. The Legion claims to have
800 priests and more than 2,500 seminarians in 22 countries, including
the United States. Regnum Christi claims 70,000 lay members in more
than 30 countries. A statement posted on the
Legion’s Website said the “Legionaries thank the Holy Father
(for the Vatican’s announcement) and embrace his provisions with
faith and obedience.” Deputies in Belgium’s
lower house of Parliament voted almost unanimously for banning the face
veil, known in Afghanistan as the burqa and in the Arab world as the
niqab. The measure must still be passed by the Belgian Senate before
becoming law, and some critics suggest it may face legal obstacles. The law would ban the face
veil in many public spaces. Violators could be fined up to $34 dollars
or face short jail sentences. Human rights groups swiftly
condemned the measure as violating freedom of expression. “Clearly this is not
a welcoming message,” said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International’s
expert on discrimination in Europe. “It’s an attempt by
certain parts of the population, certain political parties, to draw
a line in the sand as it were — and say, ‘beyond this point,
we shan’t be accepting your cultural or religious practices.”’ Belgium is not the only European
country to consider a veil ban, reflecting widespread uneasiness about
the continent’s booming Muslim community. Politicians in Germany,
the Netherlands, Italy and Switzerland have all pushed for some kind
of law — but none have gone as far as Belgium. In France, Sarkozy wants
to submit a face-veil ban bill to parliament in May, following lengthy
debate on the subject. In Belgium, a ban has drawn
widespread political support, as advocates argue that it is critical
to uphold women’s rights and as a security measure against extremists.
It is also critical for social integration, says the bill’s chief
sponsor, deputy Daniel Bacquelaine of the liberal Reformist Movement
party. “We think that this
measure is essential to promote living together in our society. And
if we live together, we have to be recognized — that’s not
possible if I can’t see the other’s face,” he said. But critics in France and
Belgium argue such a ban is unnecessary, since so few Muslim women actually
wear a face veil. The issue has also divided Muslims, who feel unfairly
targeted. “Even in that part
of the Muslim community in which there is no support for the niqab and
burqa, the reaction is quite negative toward the law because it’s
seen as additional stigmatization,” said Marco Martiniello, an
immigration expert at the University of Liege, in Belgium. In Belgium as in France,
a veil ban law may also face legal hurdles. France’s State Council,
the country’s highest administrative body, has warned it might
be unconstitutional. Others say the legislation may violate the European
Convention on Human Rights. |
|
|||||||