|
|||||||||
|
NEWS
ANALYSIS Vatican,
courts wrestle over who controls bishops By
FRANCIS X. ROCCA c. 2010 Religion News Service VATICAN CITY (RNS) —
Is Pope Benedict XVI legally responsible for the actions of US Catholic
bishops who mishandled cases of pedophile priests, allowing them to
sexually abuse more children? Some plaintiffs’ lawyers
are arguing that victims of clerical sex abuse should be able to sue
the Vatican itself for damages, in large part because they say bishops
are effectively employees or officials of the Holy See. The pope appoints
and disciplines bishops, they note, and he can force them to step down
if he deems them unfit. The Vatican, meanwhile, argues
that bishops are not agents of the pope. In a motion to dismiss a federal
lawsuit in Kentucky on May 17, Vatican lawyer Jeffrey Lena pointed out,
among other distinctions, that bishops do not receive their salaries
from Rome, nor work on Vatican property. An advocate for American
abuse victims called the Vatican’s claims “disingenuous.” “The church isn’t
some loosely-knit hippie commune with diffuse authority,” said
Barbara Dorris, outreach director for the Survivors Network of those
Abused by Priests. “It’s an ancient, rigid, crystal-clear
hierarchy in which bishops ordain, transfer and supervise priests and
in which the pope selects, transfers and supervises bishops.” The question of just how
much autonomy bishops exercise in matters of clerical sex abuse hinges
on the interpretation of specific Vatican policies in that area. But generally speaking, the
working relationship between the bishop of Rome — the pope —
and the heads of the world’s other 3,154 Catholic dioceses is
a complex one, which cannot be easily translated into the terms of a
modern corporate flow chart. Once a bishop is assigned
to lead a diocese, church law assigns him the primary authority over
pastoral, educational, liturgical and administrative life there. “The bishop exercises
this authority in his own name, not as the vicar of the pope,”
writes Rev. James A. Coriden in An Introduction to Canon Law. “(The doctrine of)
primacy gives the pope the power to intervene in the life of the local
church when exceptional circumstances make it necessary,” Coriden
writes. “In this sense it implies a ‘reserve power’
to be used in emergency situations.” As Rev. Thomas J. Reese notes
in his book Inside the Vatican, canon law requires bishops to obtain
the Vatican’s permission before making certain decisions, such
as selling or ceding diocesan property valued at $3 million or more. And the Vatican does occasionally
overrule bishops on a range of matters, including marriage annulments,
parish closings and the approval of textbooks for religious instruction.
But as Reese recounts, such interventions typically come after clergy
or laity in a diocese choose to contest their bishop’s actions
through a lengthy appeals process. The most routine example
of Vatican supervision takes place once every five years, when every
bishop must file a lengthy questionnaire and make a visit to Rome, which
includes a 15-minute meeting with the pope. In between those meetings,
the vast share of a bishop’s actions is left to his discretion
and responsibility. That organizational reality
is consistent with the Catholic doctrine of subsidiarity, which posits
(as a matter of moral principle) that decisions should be made at the
level closest to the people affected by them. But the high degree of decentralization
that characterizes church administration also reflects a more mundane
consideration: work flow. Copyright 2010 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission. |
|
|||||||