|
|||||||||
|
BUILDING A CULTURE OF LIFE
However, instead
of focusing on the many concrete ways in which we can help women who want
to have their children, many Canadian newspapers and media outlets used
this opportunity to continue bemoaning the current government’s
lack of funding for Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is seen as
the champion of women’s rights, bringing abortions to women everywhere.
Now, this certainly
isn’t the view of Planned Parenthood that I have received during
my many years of being a Catholic, so I decided to investigate this self-professed
women’s rights advocate on the Internet to find out what the average
person would be able to learn if they hadn’t been raised in a pro-life
bubble. My search revealed
a number of websites, either praising or condemning Planned Parenthood,
and left me confused. Each side made impressive claims, cited “the
research” as being on their side and had some rather scathing remarks
for their opposition. I think that if I had been reading about this debate
for the first time, I wouldn’t have known which side to support
and would have given the tie-breaker to Planned Parenthood. After all,
they have had government funding for many years, so surely the work of
the Rosa Acuna project (a series of undercover videos exposing Planned
Parenthood workers who break state laws in the US) must be sensationalist. Unfortunately,
I believe that many people would end their investigation here. They would
not go on to look at the Q & A portion of Planned Parenthood’s
website, which claims that having an abortion is neither emotionally nor
psychologically dangerous. Nor would they take the time to find the study
by pro-choice researcher Dr. David M. Fergusson, which found an increase
in mental health problems in women who had abortions and identified abortion
as “an adverse life event” (Reaction to Abortion and Subsequent
Mental Health, volume 195 of the British Journal of Psychiatry, pages
420 - 426, in case anyone wants to look it up). Abortion may not
constitute a severe trauma for every woman, but it seems worth at least
mentioning the possibility of psychological distress to a woman who is
trying to make an informed decision. Another point
of contention for the polarized sites is the Abortion Breast Cancer (ABC)
link. Pro-life websites provide gales of information detailing the science
behind this link and giving statistics to back it up. The Planned Parenthood
website replies to a question concerning the ABC link, saying “No.
No. No. No. No. There is no truth to this at all. It is one of those nasty
myths invented by anti-choice organizations to frighten women away from
having an abortion.” What’s really
frightening is just how often Planned Parenthood overstates its version
of the truth and how little real information they provide to women who
visit their website expecting to hear balanced information. I wonder how
women who were told that they were carrying a blob of cells feel when
they go in for their first ultrasound of a wanted pregnancy. Are they
grateful for the lie that eased their conscience, or angry at being tricked
into destroying their own child? Given that the
science on these topics appears to have arrived at a stalemate, all the
average Internet user has to rely on is anecdotal evidence. Amidst all
the right-to-life and right-to-abortion groups jockeying for public opinion
are a few quiet websites, filled with message boards from women who have
experienced abortion first-hand. These women tell
heart-breaking stories about how psychologically devastating abortion
was for them and warn others that it is not consequence-free. The testimonies
are often graphic and gut-wrenching, but the women on these sites courageously
give them because they know that abortion is about more than competing
ideologies. In the end this is all the proof I need. These women tell more than any survey or doctor ever could. I believe that Planned Parenthood is motivated by its own ideology, not by undisputed scientific fact. I don’t expect the government to close it down, but such an organization does not deserve public funding because Planned Parenthood is not, nor has it ever been, the voice of the people. Deutscher has recently returned to Saskatchewan from Ottawa after completing a master of arts in public ethics at St. Paul University and working with the Catholic Organization for Life and Family. |
|
|||||||